Jan Morgan’s Arkansas Shooting Range Is A Muslim-Free Zone

*Facepalm*:

Jan-Morgan-Muslim-Free-Zone

Here is her justification of why her shooting range is now a Muslim-free Zone.  Oh cool she has a “media company”… yea this plan is pretty see-through.  Standard attention grab at the national level.  Create OUTRAGE and you’ll lose some people but overall probably gain customers through bigotry and free advertising.  I don’t know enough about Islam to comment on the validity of her arguments on the excerpts she grabbed from the Quran.  I went to school with numerous Muslim guys and girls that were great people so regardless of what “some” people who follow Islam have done, I can’t hate.  White people of all religions have done terrible things since the beginning of time too.  The holocaust, Oklahoma city bombing,  etc… what’s next a Jewish range owner banning people with German sounding names from their shooting range?  Yea that would be derpy too.

Thoughts?  Genius business plan in these ISIS times, or derp-level-infinity?


Comments

54 responses to “Jan Morgan’s Arkansas Shooting Range Is A Muslim-Free Zone”

  1. It may be muslim free, but, it ain’t crazy lady free.

  2. Most Muslims view ISIS in the same way most Christians feel about Westboro Baptist Church.

    1. cardsfanbj Avatar

      Dang. Stole my comment.

      1. +1+

        Not sure whether the + goes before or after the 1.

        True, the media wants ut to be the bad guys. Just like they slandered jews before now they are trying to make muslims look like the bad guys. Truth is that less than 1% of muslims are the crazy kind (the real number is about 0.5% and less). The demonstrations by muslims against ISIS also went unnoticed in world media. It doesn’t fit the narrative.

        1. Even with 0.5 % it’s make 8 millions of madman.
          Though…

          1. lolinski Avatar

            And how many of those 8 million (actually 7.5 million) are organized? How many of those are actually going to do something, how many of those are capable of doing anything. Most of em are rabble-rousers and loudmouths.

    2. Um, when was the last time you saw a Westboro Baptist Church member crucify children, rape women, murder, pillage, and plunder? Just wondering. Maybe I missed something.

      1. lolinski Avatar

        Just you wait, they simply haven’t got the numbers for that yet.

        + I doubt that muslims or christians would crucify people, that’s sorta a jewish thing.

        1. Romans crucified people.

    3. REALLY ? I have ,personally, seen Christians line up to block that group from being able to disturb a funeral. When was the last time you seen a group of muslims rally to protest against ISIS?

    4. That is pure BS. 100 percent lie. Your entire premise is wrong. First off, Westboro Baptist Church hasn’t killed anyone. Westboro Baptist Church hasn’t blown up a single building. They stand around and hold signs. Really stupid signs, by the way. To even uses terrorists and that stupid church as a comparison is completely off base. Furthermore, you are completely off base saying most Muslims look at radicals the way Christians look at Westboro. That is demonstrably false. You do NOT see huge masses of Christians dancing in the streets when Westboro does one of their stupid stunts. You do NOT see Christians pouring funds into their organization. You do NOT see Christians getting angry when someone insults Westboro. But you DO see Muslims pouring money into those groups. You DO see Muslims dancing in the streets when an American is killed. The fact is, most Muslims do NOT view the radicals like Christians view Westboro. If they DID, we wouldn’t have terrorism.

  3. 2 out of 10, would not bang.

    I’m shallow and mean spirited. I’m working on it. Sorry ’bout that.

    1. My standards are lower. Plus, I know from experience that crazy is great in bed right up until your tires get slashed.

      1. Don’t keep your tires next to the bed then.

        1. TheBear Avatar

          Crazy gets what crazy wants.

  4. Maybe her business is going under? Maybe she decided to go out in a blaze of moronic glory?

  5. Publicity stunt. *yawn*

  6. It IS pure derp, but it will probably be a great business decision in the long run.

    1. Don’t agree. I see more shooters being inclusive rather than exclusive. And I’d hit it.

  7. Idiocy.

  8. i can’t blame her. i don’t trust Muslims with their inability to eat shell fish, and their worshiping of sun tazoo, the Chinese Prince Matchabelli.

  9. This is very un-American.

  10. Crazy Bitch

  11. I don’t know why she is doing it, all I know is she is going full retard.

  12. Consider checking out the article about this issue at Gun Nuts Media. Caleb been getting the 21 bigot salute for his similar opinion. I too, feel this lady is way off base. Please forgive the plug of another site.

    1. “Bigots” lets not start talking like anti-2A people. In today’s society you can be called a bigot and racist for flying a gadsden flag; lets not turn into those people by throwing that term around willy nilly.

      1. I used the word, bigot, correctly.
        http://i.word.com/idictionary/bigot

  13. Whatever. Your all so self righteous. It’s her business, and she can damn well do what she wants with it, and THAT is as AMERICAN as it gets. I love how you denigrate the business owner as being against freedom, for exercising her freedom to refuse business to anyone. It’s a PRIVATE business. Can’t wait to see how you feel when a “MUSLIM” runs into a cafe your sitting in, and detonates his explosives. It’s in the Koran. Religion of peace indeed.

    1. You’re a dumb ass for two reasons but I’m not going to bother listing them because I’m afraid all the complicated words might confuse you.

    2. Cheers.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cAoXgZLRee0
      http://pamelageller.com/

      This county is so politically correct we are really just marching off a cliff with this one. People seem more concerned with non-offense than actually formulating an opinion on what essentially is the most psychotic ideology in human history. We can bury our heads in the sand, or we can stand up and take a look at what is really happening. These “people” saw the heads off of children. Routinely. You may say that the radicals are a minute percentage that does not represent the whole of islam but if that is so where are the moderates? Where are all of these peaceful muslims? They are all taught from their youths that all non-muslims are nothing but kafir pig-shit. Even if the average moderate muslim disagreed with the actions of the 15%- 20% it would not make a bit of difference. The majority of Germans in WW2 were not radicals, yet look at how many were murdered by their ideology. The same can be said of Russia, China, Cambodia, Japan, nearly all of Africa. The moderates are irrelevant. If one who reads this has not actually seen what these animals do every single day then I suggest taking a look at the two links I provided.

      1. BRO, do you even constitution?

        I’ve applied your logic to white people using almost your exact wording:

        This county is so politically correct we are really just marching off a cliff with this one. People seem more concerned with non-offense than actually formulating an opinion on what essentially is the most psychotic ideology in human history. We can bury our heads in the sand, or we can stand up and take a look at what is really happening. These “people” enslaved millions for profit. Routinely. You may say that the radicals are a minute percentage that does not represent the whole of [WHITE, CHRISTENDOM] but if that is so where are the moderates? Where are all of these [NON-RACIST WHITE “PEOPLE”]? They are all taught from their youths that all [NON-WHITES] are nothing but [DARK SKINNED] pig-shit. Even if the average moderate [WHITE PERSON] disagreed with the actions of the 15%- 20% it would not make a bit of difference. The majority of WHITES in HISTORY were not SLAVERS, yet look at how many were ENSLAVED by their ideology. The same can be said of Russia, China, Cambodia, Japan, nearly all of Africa. The moderates are irrelevant. If one who reads this has not actually seen what these animals do every single day then I suggest taking a look at the [PALTRY EVIDENCE] I provided.

        1. Irrevelant comparaison.
          Christain church and withe occidentals begin to condamn the slavery in 1441, pope eugene IV make a law to excomuniate people who enslave black people.
          In 1537, pope Paul III forbide salvery of amérindian people.
          If you want to find slave actually look to the Gulf monarchy or Nigeria.
          No more incitment to murder hérétics since the middle ages and that’s the majority of white people who votes law against racism.
          Totaly irrevelant

          1. First: Did you write that on an etch-a-sketch?

            Second: Rob’s argument was a crock of shit made up of massive generalizations that are unacceptable to you as soon as they are applied to white, Christians. I hope you see the double standard in that. If you think that race and color are ‘irrevelant’ then please hold Ms Morgan’s standpoint to the same standard.

            Can I also ask you this question: Who the f else was “votes law against racism” other than white people? Please, point me in the direction of a historical vote or referendum that even considered the opinion of black people before they were legally allowed to vote. TOTALY IRREVELANT

            1. First : English is not my first mother tongue.

              Second : you have simply nothing, initaly, to blame to Christians in this present day. No mass murder, no bomb, any inquisition, any terrorism in the name of god. Absolutely nothing to generalize.
              Simple question : Who allow the black people to vote in white country except that the white ?

              You could show how much you’re nice with people who want to kill you,to try indefinitely to lower the number of potentia

            2. First : English is not my first mother tongue.

              Second : you have simply nothing, initaly, to blame to Christians in this present day. No mass murder, no bomb, any inquisition, any terrorism in the name of god. Absolutely nothing to generalize.
              Simple question : At the beginning who allow the black people to vote in white country except that the white ? I don’t remember about a black revolution. Withe people are sooooo racists that they even vote to black president.

              You could show how much you’re nice with people who want to kill you, to try indefinitely to lower the number of potential terrorists who is far away than 7.5 millions. Absolutely no need to be organized to claim special status, to build mosque, to destroy local tradition, to undermine non-muslim society. Lethal action is not only the point. The fact is that you have a lethal threat you decide to ignore and more embarrassing you bring on to ignore.
              I just see stupidity or complicity.

        2. How many other countries fought massive, bloody, and extremely costly civil wars to end slavery? And last time I checked, Westboro Baptist folks weren’t doing more than holding up asshole signs, not cutting people’s heads off or flying into buildings. I could care less about the majority of peaceful muslims, but the minority have created a very bad image for themselves and their religion, and how many terror groups are there today that are NOT muslim?

          1. Taylor, read a book bro. According to the FBI, 90% of incidents on US soil that meet the standard to be labeled a terrorist attack are committed by Non-muslim individuals or organizations. According to UNC’s department of sociology, as of February of 2014 only 33 Americans had been murdered on US soil by Muslim terrorists since 9/11. In the same time period, 180 000 people were murdered in unrelated incidents in the US. So, if you’re going to hold all Muslims accountable for terrorism, then I guess you have unrelated murder victim blood on your hands too.

            1. Bro:
              http://www.state.gov/j/ct/rls/other/des/123085.htm

              Don’t see many non-muslim groups… and note I wasn’t only talking about US soil.

              1. If you’re not talking about US soil terrorism then you are having the wrong conversation. Explain how a document that actually reads “FOREIGN Terrorist Organizations” is relevant to a stunt by Jan Morgan to prevent LOCAL attacks? I invite you to dispute the facts already outlined in my above posts that demonstrate Muslims are responsible for a fraction of terrorism related deaths INSIDE the USA.

            2. Are you including the workplace violence case that that happened at Fort Hood.
              Face it, the current administration is cooking the numbers, white washing anything that even smell like Islamic terrorism.

              This is not J Edgar Hoover’s FBI, it has been politized by that disrespecter of the law Eric Holder.

              1. When in doubt, conspiracy.

          1. You post that like a I haven’t seen what a child’s head looks like, detached from their body. You’re so horrified by the act that you’re okay with undermining the constitutional rights of Muslim Citizens. I understand that but it is unacceptable. Do me a favor and apply your cyclical logic to yourself and see how you feel if someone was denying your GOD GIVEN, CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED RIGHT, to bear arms and your right to freely associate. In her own small way, Jan Morgan is doing to brown, Muslim CITIZENS what MDA want to do gun owners. If you cannot see the hypocrisy in that then carry on in your un-american ways. Yeah, that’s right… un-american. The implications of a society that is willing to discriminate against innocent people on the basis of religion (and secretly in Jan’s case, color, i’ll bet) are heavy. Because I ask you, what’s next? If you’re scared of the downhill slope to a disarmed populace, you should be scared of this.

            Note: I really want you to picture me screaming the upper case words. Like, veins exploding blood all over my shirt.

    3. Well, I’m curious how she feels about denying law-abiding Muslim citizens the right to keep and bear arms if they walk into her store to buy a weapon. Guess the 2nd amendment only applies to her.

    4. Got it in one, her business she can do what she wants.

      And with the the number of people who seem too becoming down with Sudden Jihad Syndrome, it might be warranted.

  14. FUCK MUSLIMS AND FUCK ISIS

  15. Look bottom line is being afraid of Islam and Muslims is a natural response to the actions since 9/11/1683 (battle of vienna) till 9/11/2001 and beyond. You dont think there was a fear of romans after they sacked jerusalem in 70AD , and a fear of muslims when they took it , or when the christians took it ? You dont think there was fear of catholics by protestants or anyone else they slaughtered like the indians ? BASIC human instincts here , IF someone likes to slaughter you and teaches their people to do it on a wholesale level then you fear them and dont want them around you . No matter how you window dress it , you dont get to preach institutional genocide then say “oh we quit doing that ” …Think with your heads not your hearts

  16. Grindstone Avatar
    Grindstone

    The next rise of fascism will not be at the expense of the Jews, but the Muslims. Even here we already have the blanket statements condemning and excluding all who wear the label “Muslim” yet no evidence that they are all guilty, based purely on fear and xenophobia. It’s people like these that gave us such wonderful things as the DHS, TSA, NSA, and the Patriot Act.

    1. TheBear Avatar

      The irony is people who get pissed at anti gunners judging all gun owners based on the actions of a few, then turning around and doing the same damn thing for the second largest religion in the world.

      I am not a lover of Muslims – too many have tried to kill me. However, I am proud to be an American and I am proud of what this country stands for.

      I think people need to put on their critical thinking caps and be able to differentiate between PC silliness and legitimate derp.

  17. PrzFghtr Avatar

    #stopsjihadoncontact

  18. She claims to be a Constitutionalist but I am pretty sure the Constitution doesn’t allow any individual to arbitrarily decide what is a religion and what isn’t. She claims to be a 2nd Amendment absolutist and is against background checks but I guess she’s OK with a background check for religion. She vilifies businesses that don’t allow open carry but claims she has the right as a business owner to decide on this. Can you say hypocrite? She also denies that she did this for attention but if that were so she would have quietly denied anyone who she thinks is a Muslim without posting it to her web page or FB page. Not sure how you can tell someone’s religion by looking at them anyway. There are lots of Middle Eastern Christians and Jews, and lots of Muslims who aren’t or don’t look Middle Eastern. Does she ask what religion before she sells a gun?

  19. I would go shooting in the buff and take my pet pot belly pig.

  20. I love what you are doing and your husband is one of the luckiest……….you are so damn nice looking

    1. ENDO-Mike Avatar

      Lol wat?