Waiting for the police is not an acceptable option. Arm yourselves:
Heh yea, I love when people hear the word “body armor” and they think it’s an impenetrable shield that makes a person impervious to anything but head shots.
Mass shootings would be over just as quickly as they started if people started fighting back. Like MrColionNoir mentioned, most of those losers kill themselves at the first sign of resistance anyway… perfect, no burden on the jails and legal system if they are given a reason to increase the lead in their diet early.
MrColionNoir is wearing the AR-15 Picatinny Rail t-shirt from ENDO.
Thoughts?
Comments
9 responses to “It’s Frustrating Trying To Kill People That Can Shoot Back”
Linked at mine.
I’ve never understood that logic either. “If someone had shot back, it would have made things worse.” Really, so it would’ve been worse if a cop had been there?
The inevitable response to that is “oh, but the police are sooo highly trained”, which, from what I’ve heard, is generally a misconception (correct me if I’m wrong)
Right, but at that point, they’ve admitted that there are circumstances in which an armed response is good. With your foot in the door now, you just gradually open it. “Okay, how about off duty cops? What about retired police? Current military personnel? Veterans? Firearms instructors?” and so on.
This reminds me – that fat tub of lying shit Michael Moore recently said the only reason white people want guns is because they’re afraid of black people:
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/michael-moore-calm-down-white-people-and-put-away-your-guns
Pure projection on Moore’s part, yeah, but I wonder what MrColionNoir would have to say on such matters. Not that Moore would ever watch such a response – the sight of an actual black man (an intelligent, well spoken, ARMED, black man, no less) would probably send Moore frantically waddling for the nearest hiding spot. Although watching him try to cram his fat ass under a bed, shaking in fear, would be hilarious.
HEY MAN,
I’M COMPLETELY AGREE WITH YA.
BUT SOMETIMES CARRYING AN ARM MAKES PEOPLE THINK BAD ABOUT YOU.AND IT IS NOT THAT EASY OR POSSIBLE TO CARRY ARM EVEYWHERE YOU GO.
this man is one of the most realistic thinkers and speakers I’ve heard.
i tip my hat to you mr.noir
Best video you’ve done yet. The problem with trying to have an intelligent discussion with the ant-gunners is that they don’t want guns anywhere but with police and military. This is at the root of their thinking to cover their real intention they go with emotional arguments that are difficult to counter. This is why using mechanical gun facts or pro-gun statistics doesn’t get you far, only the elimination of guns will satisfy them.
For the few anti’s we have a chance to reach we have to come up with counters to their often irrational emotional points. I don’t claim to have the answer, I think it helps to have people who survived violence because of their firearms. I also think we need to explore the civil rights angle more than we have.
Perfect!