Bow-game 22plinkster:
Total showoff :P So much to take into account with this type of hunting even more so than with firearms.
I’d need a high capacity assault quiver if I was going to attempt this, and even then I’d probably leave pissed off with no arrows and no birds in the hand.
Thoughts?
Hat tip: Reg
Comments
11 responses to “Showboating By Hunting Birds With A Bow”
Men in Tights. LOL
Prince John: Such an unusual name, “Latrine.” How did your family come by it?
Latrine: We changed it in the 9th century.
Prince John: You mean you changed it TO “Latrine”?
Latrine: Yeah. Used to be “Shithouse.”
Prince John: It’s a good change. That’s a good change!
HEY BLINKIN!
i dont get bow hunting in that, do you consider the arrows a loss or do you hope to retrieve em?
And the damn things can cost a fortune… yikes
Assuming they’re not invasive pests, if he’s not eating or mounting them, he shouldn’t be killing them. That’s just morally reprehensible.
There’s a huge difference between hunting and indiscriminate killing.
Agreed. The man has skills no doubt, but I could not mow down animals like that even if they were stationary.
Lol does mounting an animal make it ok? Atleast the predatory birds surrounding him are living in paradise for a day, so nothings going to waste. Far better than killing something just because you want to have something to hang on your wall imo.
The best part is killing something that both tastes good but can also still be mounted after you ate most of it.
It must have been common enough historically, or the flu flu arrow wouldn’t have been invented. That says a lot about how skilled our ancestors were with a bow.
Blog Game obscure reference king
It makes my day even when a couple of you guys get my references.