Oh wow… this guy is good:
If I were him I would have ended my appearance with a simple “Checkmate. Thank you for having me.”
Hat tip: Weer’d World
Steven Crowder Argues Gun Rights On RT
MIL-STD-
MIL-STD-
If I were him I would have ended my appearance with a simple “Checkmate. Thank you for having me.”
Hat tip: Weer’d World
Comments
28 responses to “Steven Crowder Argues Gun Rights On RT”
Was she actually agreeing with him there at the end?
There isn’t much you could say that could properly argue this man’s statements, his statements are rock-solid.
YES! LOL
that made me laugh so hard.
It saddens me to see things like this- where a PROFESSIONAL NEWS CORRESPONDENT simply tosses to the side everything their opponent has to say.
She got what was coming to her.
PROFESSIONAL NEWS CORRESPONDENT????!?! You people do realize what “RT” stands for, don’t you? It stands for Russia Today. They’re extremely into socialist propaganda and the like. It’s the Al-Jazeera of Russia.
Otherwise, you’re right. She’s the dull-skulled imbecile poster child for all liberals who don’t get what it means to have a right to personally defend one’s right to life, liberty, and property. Just like that machine gun wal mart guy.
Yes RT and CNBC are the same tripe for the Left, that Fox is to the Right. FTR, I am a conservative, but does not mean that I like everything from the right leaning media.
He’s good. Way to slap it out of the park.
if you like crowder, check him out on youtube and Alfonzo Rachel (Zonation)
Good game, Steve.
Clear, concise and loaded with facts. Does not get any better than that.
FACEE!!!! ya well spoken!
Too bad reasoned arguments are like Kryptonite to a liberal.
I have seen Steven Crowder before and he is spot on. I highly recommend checking him out on youtube.
He is pretty good but rather than answer a lot fo the questions he deflected them. He didn’t really answered them.
I thought the same thing. He was in like full ADHD mode, started by deflecting a question and going off on a whole other tangent.
good game, kid. hit the showers.
The gun argument is an easy one to win when debating Libs.
There is only one way in which they can beat you…..they can yell, scream, interupt you or talk over you.
This is the normal debating tactic used by Libs and Dems. I see it at work almost every day. They know what they know and will throw an absolute hissy fit if they have to listen to something they don’t agree with. IF a Liberal asks you your opinion on a topic they don’t want to hear your views they want to preach to you about the wonders of ______ and you will be interrupted within seconds of speaking.
I’m glad that this reporter had the manners to listen to Crowder despite the fact that she couldn’t effectively debate him.
I have had conservatives effectively do the same thing
The only thing I wish he would have included is, “When the government has the ability to tell you that you can only have one gun a month, they also have the ability to change that 1 to a zero”.
One of the best points made here, Andy.
Lucy, we both know, I’m training to be a cage fighter.
You’re just trying to impress LaFawnda!
Who in the hell is that idiot interviewing him?
As an armed liberal it is nice to see a Con. have their own thoughts and opinions and not just use talking points. To say that people who buy more than one gun are “dangerous” is wrong and Mr. Crowder gives excellent examples for each of his arguments. Again not just talking point but an actual conversation between two people and each side not screaming over each other.
How do you know he’s conservative…..
He had me right up until the very end, when he mentioned his friend Dana Bash at CNN. Dana Bash is the very definition of presstitute.
Ha! how have i never heard that term before, awesome
I may agree with Steve on this, which is unusual. He’s usually just a wannabe Sean Hannity neo-con dweeb